He took up direct action as the final step when nothing else worked. He start to have sit-ins and marches he used does tactics because he believed that only in that matter will the government be force to give in and try to negotiate and give the colored people some respect and power.
Just like Gandhi forced the Great Britain government to negotiated some type of compromise by not giving in and lets all of the Satyagrahis be send to jail with out fighting back. So did King with his followed with the marches and the sit-ins. King just as Gandhi believed that only way to get any change is if you do protest out in the open where everyone can see you and that you are willing to accept the penalty by been send to jail.
Just as Great Britain government saw that they been unfair to the Indian people make the America government see the injustice they are showing towards colored people and make them negotiate with you to come to some kind of a compromise. King believe that only way to have justice is by having tension and the best way he saw to make justified tension is by civil disobedience.
Both King and Gandhi saw civil disobedience had been just because they felt that segregation and prosecution was unjust. They saw civil disobedience as making the opposition see that they are wrong and what they doing is morally wrong.
King and Gandhi saw the laws that where passed against their people as unjust laws because they only affected small part of people and not affect the people who pass the laws. He was trying to show how even the government made the law legal it was still unjust as a moral law and civil disobedience would have been justified as the right thing to do. Gandhi just like King felt that not everything that was legal was just and that why as King he believed that civil disobedience is the way to make just with a unjust legal law.
During this day I believe that I would take up Martin Luther Kings view on civil disobedience as my own because I see just how he said that not all laws that are legal are just. I believe that not all that is made law is just for all people but only make it just for the majority. King view on civil disobedience is more suitable for this day and age that why people would try to fallow his example if they would have to take up civil disobedience.
You can also order a custom term paper, research paper, thesis, dissertation or essay on civil disobedience from our custom essay writing service which provides students with prime-quality custom written papers. But it is a characteristic of wisdom not to do desperate things.. Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.
Men generally, under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait until they have persuaded the majority to alter them.
They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse. Why is it not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform?
Why does it not cherish its wise minority? Why does it cry and resist before it is hurt? Why does it not encourage its citizens to be on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would have them?
It is only expressing to men feebly your desire that it should prevail. A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority. There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men. Why has every man a conscience then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward.
Civil Disobedience When should civil disobedience be justified? Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to obey government laws, in an effort to bring upon a change in governmental policy or legislation. Civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the American government, because without government our society would result in chaos. There have been times when citizens have felt the need to revolt against the government because of an issue that is unjust.
There were such cases during the time of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Civil disobedience is justified when its goal is to obtain equal rights and service for everyone, without causing physical damage to people and their property, and without breaking the just laws that are already enforced.
He recommended passive resistance as a form of tension that could lead to reform of unjust laws practiced by the government. Thoreau felt that the government had established order that resisted reform and change. Thoreau refused to pay the poll tax because the money was being used to finance the Mexican War. Not only was Thoreau against the war itself but the war was over Texas which was to be used as a slave state. He believed strongly against paying money to a war he did not support, and would rather end up in jail than go against his will.
- Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau Thoreau's essay entitled "Civil Disobedience" i was an excellent way of educating the public on why people should not settle for a less than perfect government.
King view on civil disobedience is more suitable for this day and age that why people would try to fallow his example if they would have to take up civil disobedience. You can also order a custom term paper, research paper, thesis, dissertation or essay on civil disobedience from our custom essay writing service which provides students with .
My civil neighbor, the tax-gatherer, is the very man I have to deal with- for it is, after all, with men and not with parchment that I quarrel- and he has voluntarily chosen to be an agent of the government. Civil Disobedience Civil disobedience: “Refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change in governmental policy or legislation, characterized by the use of passive resistance or other non-violent means” (Houghton, ).
Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to obey government laws, in an effort to bring upon a change in governmental policy or legislation. Civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the American government, because without . Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more. Get started now!